In the highlight reel age, we figured we should have an award for the most elusive skill player. Ironically it is named for a player who made his living quite some time before the highlight reel age. The award goes to the most elusive skill player in America - a guy that defenders just can't seem to wrap up. Obviously, having a strong highlight package will play into the voting. 2008 Winner - Jahvid Best (RB, California)
Last year's winner was dropped from consideration when he added one of the most gruesome injuries I have ever seen to his highlight reel. Best is a great player, but now I can't think about him without remembering that awful concussion he suffered after leaping into the end zone against Oregon State.
I have whittled the list of finalists down to the final five. Here is the pertinent info for each of them, in alphabetical order.
2009 Finalists:
DEZMON BRISCOE(Jr. WR, Kansas)
A relative unknown on this list, Briscoe has been one of the best go-to receivers in the nation for the past couple seasons. He can make the big catch AND has the speed to take it the distance. 2009 Stats: 84 receptions for 1,337 yards (15.4 avg) and 9 touchdowns; 1 kickoff return touchdown; 1 rushing touchdown
Highlights:
MARDY GILYARD (Sr. WR, Cincinnati)
Gilyard has the knack for making his biggest plays when the team needs it most. See the 99-yard kickoff return for touchdown late in the first half when trailing by 21 against Pittsburgh on the last day of the regular season for evidence. 2009 Stats: 80 receptions for 1,150 yards (14.4 avg) and 11 touchdowns; 34 kickoff returns for 1,074 yards (31.6 avg) and 2 touchdowns; 16 punt returns for 202 yards (12.6 avg) and 1 touchdown
Highlights:
JEREMY KERLEY(Jr. WR, TCU)
Sure, Kerley might not get nearly as many touches as the other guys on this list, but that only means he has a higher percentage of highlights per touch. The chances of Kerley winning the Sayers isn't high, but his punt return for touchdown against Colorado State this year is enough by itself to make him a finalist. 2009 Stats: 38 receptions for 467 yards (12.3 avg) and 2 touchdowns; 34 punt returns for 487 yards (14.3 avg) and 2 touchdowns; 17 kickoff returns for 457 yards (26.9 avg); 50 rushing yards and 3 touchdowns
Highlight:
JACQUIZZ RODGERS(Soph. RB, Oregon State)
You should probably get used to seeing Rodgers' name on the list of Finalists for the Sayers Award. Only a sophomore, Rodgers is already putting together quite a string of impressive plays and drawing comparisons to the one and only Barry Sanders. 2009 Stats: 255 carries for 1,377 yards (5.4 avg) and 20 touchdowns; 74 receptions for 509 yards (6.9 avg) and 1 touchdown; 1 passing touchdown
Highlights:
C.J. SPILLER(Sr. RB, Clemson)
I'm not the biggest Spiller fan in the world, but there is no way you can ignore his sheer athleticism. He practically defines what this award is about. When Spiller gets his hands on the ball in the open field, there isn't a defender alive (other than maybe Fred Smoot) who thinks he has a good chance at taking him down. 2009 Stats: 201 carries for 1,145 yards (5.7 avg) and 11 touchdowns; 21 kickoff returns for 708 yards (33.7 avg) and 4 touchdowns; 33 receptions for 445 yards (13.5 avg) and 4 touchdowns; 8 punt returns for 210 yards (26.3 avg) and 1 touchdown; 1 passing touchdown
.When you're looking for a college football expert pick, a good strategy is to search for a trusted name in college football. Industry veterans are much more likely to provide quality
J.Pike's Final 2009 Computer Power Rankings - Top 25
1. Alabama
14-0
104.9
2. Texas
13-1
99.8
3. Florida
13-1
97.9
4. Boise State
14-0
91.4
5. Cincinnati
12-1
91.0
6. Ohio State
11-2
89.4
7. TCU
12-1
88.4
8. Iowa
11-2
85.5
9. Oregon
10-3
84.8
10. Virginia Tech
10-3
84.3
11. BYU
11-2
83.0
12. Penn State
11-2
81.4
13. LSU
9-4
79.7
14. Georgia Tech
11-3
77.1
15. Pittsburgh
10-3
76.4
16. Wisconsin
10-3
76.3
17. Nebraska
10-4
76.2
18. Utah
10-3
75.9
19. USC
9-4
71.2
20. West Virginia
9-4
69.7
21. Miami
9-4
69.3
22. Central Michigan
12-2
68.9
23. Oklahoma State
9-4
67.9
24. Oklahoma
8-5
65.4
25. Texas Tech
9-4
64.8
*updated Jan.8
The Greatest Tournament of All Time
For info about the tournament, click HERE and HERE.
SCORES:
Round 1 - Click HERE
Round 2 - Click HERE
Round 3 - Click HERE
Bracket Finals - Click HERE
Final 64 - Click HERE
Final Four - Click HERE
ROUND RECAPS:
Round 1 - Click HERE
Round 2 - Click HERE
Round 3 - Click HERE
Final 64 Preview - Click HERE
Sweet 16 Preview - Click HERE
Final Four Preview - Click HERE
BRACKET:
For an Excel spreadsheet file containing the entire bracket and a search tab to help you find your team, feel free to email me at jimmy.wrench@hotmail.com
HOW WE DID IT:
The Greatest Tournament of All Time is a tournament we are simulating at Pikes Picks that includes the top 2,048 teams from the last 32 seasons of college football. That just happens to coincide with my lifetime (1977-2008).
We developed a power ranking formula independent of statistics that is based on who you played and whether you won or not. That power ranking was applied to all 3,719 teams that played Division 1-A football from the 1977 season through the 2008 season.
The seeding for the tournament was done by ordering all teams by their power ranking. The top 2,048 teams made the field, and were divided into 64 brackets each containing 32 teams. So the 64 brackets will play off, with each bracket winner advancing to the final field of 64, which we are calling "The Bracket of Champions".
The games are simulated using Pikes Picks' own score prediction formula that takes into account factors such as average points per game scored and allowed by each team, as well as whether or not each team usually scores more or less points than is expected of them.
THANKS:
A big thanks to James Howell, whose website provided all the source data to plug into our formulas, and to the USA Today College Football Encyclopedia, the most complete recap of the past 55 years of college football on the market.
1 comment:
.When you're looking for a college football expert pick, a good strategy is to search for a trusted name in college football. Industry veterans are much more likely to provide quality
Post a Comment